Titan X/ HDR vs. HDR off

[Astro]

After two days off using FI with the Titan X pascal I want to share my observations.
I can now use 3840 with HDR and FXAA, or 2880 with HDR and 4xSaa, anyway there is still some kind of distracting low frequency shimmer on scenery objects.
Fps are about 35-50/90, gpu usage in that case is about 60 percent.
VRAM usage always exceeds 8GB with uncompressed textures I can even use the full 12GB of the Titan.
The 3840 resolution with HDR off and 4xMSaa looks by far the best , good sharpness and way less shimmering, I also tried 8xMsaa in FI, but that results in a 90 percent gpu usage and somethimg like 40/20 fps.
If Dan could find a way to brighten up the cockpits, and get rid of the visibility artefacts with HDR off, we would have something pretty perfect.

[Melchor]

Yeah, If Dan could brighten up the cockpit that would be nice. My system cant handle HDR.

[theskyisthelimit99]

With the 1080 FTW 8GB, this is the very issue, that 4xaa tanks the Vram over 8GB (so does setting textures beyond "high").. so i've had to live with NO Aa in the sim and 8x in FI at 3840 res.. lots of shimmer..

I noticed in HDR off mode, that the shimmering is reduced and dark.. so i thought (per this thread i started viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4265).. that i'd try MaxxFX to boost the gamma.. but unfortunately that only boosts it in the LCD/2D version.. and the bright controls in FI arent enough to get things where they need to be..

There needs to be a way to increase the gamma, likely from the FI interface since it controls what comes into the goggles.. would be a huge plus.