I'm sure my system can handle it. I'm running an A2A aircraft with ORBX scenery and REX, and I have rock solid 70+ frames when running Flyinside with 4K.. I want to crank it even higher..
Can it be overridden somehow?
admin wrote:That's awesome! So pixel density is really just another way of expressing resolution. Higher pixel density is the same as higher resolution, just a different way of writing the number
If you want to go above the resolution on the FlyInside Menu, you can! Just edit the resolution manually in the FlyInside Settings file, location here: http://wiki.flyinside-fsx.com/index.php/Settings_Files
You will see two different lines in the Settings ini with your resolution, just edit them both to match a new higher resolution, and best of luck!
keem85 wrote:I got it working with 5k just fine without problems.. I also got it working in 8k
aurel42 wrote:keem85 wrote:I got it working with 5k just fine without problems.. I also got it working in 8k
So jelly. Tell me everything! What kind of rig? How does it look? What happens when you add AA on top of it?
keem85 wrote:AA works fine on top of it, no problems. I have a MSI 1080 GX, a 4770k overclocked to 4.5GHz. I'm running the game from a normal HDD, no SSD. All stutter disappeared after purchasing Vengeance Pro 16gb 2400mhz RAM.
I learnt the hard way that I shouldn't have altered the .cfg file at all.. They should be clean as snow
aurel42 wrote:Since your question has been answered, I'll shamelessly hijack this thread to ask your advice about my rig.keem85 wrote:AA works fine on top of it, no problems. I have a MSI 1080 GX, a 4770k overclocked to 4.5GHz. I'm running the game from a normal HDD, no SSD. All stutter disappeared after purchasing Vengeance Pro 16gb 2400mhz RAM.
My setup is inches away from your setup, yet my result is miles away from your result.
I do run significantly slower RAM (DDR3-1600). I was told that upgrading the RAM "isn't worth it", because it wouldn't make a difference for most games (blabla highly localized code blabla big cpu caches blabla), perhaps FSX is the exception to the rule?
The specs for my board are saying: "Support for DDR3 3200(O.C.) / 3100(O.C.) / 3000(O.C.) / 2933(O.C.) / 2800(O.C.) / 2666(O.C.) / 2600(O.C.) / 2500(O.C.) / 2400(O.C.) / 2200(O.C.) / 2133(O.C.) / 2000(O.C.) / 1866(O.C.) / 1800(O.C.) / 1600 / 1333 MHz memory modules" -- not sure how to read that and whether it means I can just buy some faster-than-1600 DDR3 RAM and use it at it's max speed. Any idea?
I did try a bit of CPU overclocking, but with my (air) cooling, the 4790K already runs at 90°C when I try 4.4 GHz, which seems a bit too hot, so I guess I will have to invest in better cooling, too.I learnt the hard way that I shouldn't have altered the .cfg file at all.. They should be clean as snow
Huh. Not even an affinity mask to "disable" HT for the sim?
Thanks for any advice you can give!
keem85 wrote:I guess it's not for nothing that Lockheed Martin is telling us NOT to disable the hyperthreading, at the same time saying that the .cfg doesn't need to be altered.. I learned the hard way that they were right..
And on to the RAM.. It made a huge difference for me in regards to stuttering at least.. I upped from 1333 to 2600 DDR3.. Best choice in a long time! It's a class 11, but it still has a low latency..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest